Data Center Management Highlights
Server upgrade strategy for a large datacenter in the internet information services industry.
Issues
- Several months required for internal analysis.
- Critical errors and lack of transparency in analyst’s spreadsheet.
- Goal maximized the value for the IT department instead of shareholders.
- Lack of flexibility for choosing server upgrades.
- No accounting of potential lost revenue for suboptimal datacenter performance.
- Unrealistic projections of demand for datacenter services.
Provisdom's Solution
- Required only 3 days for complete analysis.
- Straightforward inclusion of uncertainty for future demand and revenue.
- Flexible strategy based on projected learning about demand. The upgrade strategy balances expected future revenue with upgrade costs based on current information about demand.
- Proper inclusion of tax and depreciation effects on shareholder value.
- Direct maximization of shareholder value instead of departmentally motivated goal.
Results
- Identified spreadsheet errors causing discrepancies of between $119 million and $172 million in shareholder value.
- Included more information known to be relevant, providing a seven-year strategy increasing shareholder value by $460 million.
- The strategy would also prevent an average of 66,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, while still meeting 100% of the data demand even in extreme cases.
- Time required: 3 days + 3 hours of client time.
|
|
|
|
|